atolemdro

atolemdro

100% life from concentrate

You can scroll the shelf using and keys

the case of the heroic villain

09/15/11 , , , , , , , ,

the scene reads like a bad steven seagal movie:

In Benton Township, Michigan, two armed robbers wearing masks burst into a near-deserted Walgreens at 4:30 a.m. To pharmacist Jeremy Hoven, it was a prescription for trouble. So he filled it with hot lead.

however, an interesting moral and legal dilemma has emerged out of this real-life drama.   just a few days after hoven thwarted the robbery, walgreens fired the local hero for violating its “non-escalation policy” and its ban on firearms. hoven later responded with a wrongful termination lawsuit.  check out this good morning america report for security footage from the day in question.

i’m siding with walgreens on this one.  i support and appreciate the hoven’s actions in the moment, but i can’t cosign him having a gun there in the first place.  his “i didn’t know that guns weren’t allowed at the pharmacy” defense is ridiculous (not a commonplace thing but if he still had any doubts, he should’ve asked management before bringing a loaded weapon on the premises).  for some good pr, walgreens could have toss him a healthy severance package reward for saving the day, but the man deserved to be fired.

what do you think?

Advertisements

What do you think?

Please keep your comments polite and on-topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

comments

hmmm…a moral dilemma indeed. why would you bring a gun? i remember “ignorance of the law isn’t and excuse” or something like that. but on the other hand, would it have been better if he let the robbers get their loot? I wonder…this was a very interesting post, as i also am in the mood of posting stuff that would make people question their own views and standards. thank you so much for posting this, and i would definitely bookmark this for future reference and of course i’ll give proper attribution if i ever use it. thank you so much for posting!

in one of the articles i read, a cop said that he would’ve handled the robbery the same way as hoven. but yeah, a pharmacist having a gun there in the first place is pretty problematic. i would love to see how the actual lawsuit plays out.

and you’re welcome! do let me know if you end up using the post so i can check it out.

note

09/15/11

well there wouldn’t be a moral dilemma if it was a cop since they’re supposed to bring guns but a pharmacist? it surely is problematic. the fact that we agree about this makes me think that walgreens is more likely to win the case. i guess the person can use the media though and do a “trial by publicity” thing and destroy the public image of walgreens. anyways thank you so much for a very good post!

%d bloggers like this: